Take evidence of Pakistan links to United Nations, CPM tells Centre

With evidence of Pakistani links to the audacious Mumbai terror attacks coming to light, the CPI(M) wants the UPA Government to internationalise India's diplomatic offensive against Islamabad by taking the proof to the United Nations Security Council.

The extraordinary step, the party feels, will help mount international pressure on the Pakistani government to crackdown on terrorist elements operating from that country. Also, it is of the view that the killing of foreign nationals in India by terrorists has international implications.

In detail, the CPI(M) wants the Government to utilise the post-9/11 UNSC resolution against terrorism (1373) that puts it in black and white that all countries have obligations to take steps against terrorist activities and to deny "safe havens to those who finance, plan, support, or commit terrorist acts".

"If we have that kind of evidence against Pakistan, why should we shy away from utilising an international resolution which could help us," asks CPI(M) Politburo member Brinda Karat. Once taken the matter to the UNSC, the party says the world body can decide on the measures to be adopted to "identify and curb such terrorist activities".

The CPI(M) says the resolution adopted by the UNSC days after the September 11 terror attacks in the US can help India like any other country in its fight against terror. "It will help in putting pressure on Pakistan to give up its policy of harbouring terrorists," Karat told The Indian Express.

CPI(M) general secretary Prakash Karat also put forward this suggestion at the all-party meeting convened by the Prime Minister on Sunday, but it was not accepted due to lack of consensus.

Senior CPI(M) leaders point out that External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee has already gone on record to state that elements in Pakistan are appeared to be behind the attacks while reports in the media about investigation also point in that direction.

"Investigating agencies will have to produce whatever evidence they have got so far. If they believe there is a prime facie evidence to suggest the role of elements in Pakistan in the attacks, they should make it available to the international community and corner Islamabad," a senior leader said.

Why India is a target

We're poor. We're illiterate. We're still traditional. Too many religions, too many languages, too many ethnicities. What do we have that the extremists repeatedly make us the target of their terrorism?
Those very things - poverty, illiteracy, tradition, multiple religions, ethnicities and languages. Not because they are a fertile breeding ground for radical recruits but because India is finding workable, affordable and replicable solutions which will help it overcome the same problems. Those solutions are being emulated by emerging societies across the world, giving them hope for their own futures. That is why India's unexpected rise is threatening to those forces that work in the darkness of despair. Socially, politically and economically, India sits between two extremes: the West and China. The models of the western world are too developed to be easily adapted - 50 years of aid has not been effective. China is autocratic, its top-down growth delivered by an appointed, disciplined elite to an obedient population. Neither condition is universal. India's is. "India is, in a sense, the crucible of the world," says Prableen Sabhaney of Fabindia. Under the umbrella of India, in varying stages of development, is the rest of the world - south Asia, where it is the mother culture, but also Africa, some nations of the Middle East, south and central America, central and south east Asia. These are regions rich in assets, and human capital with the potential and now the desire, to develop. They all think: If India can do it, so can they. India is showing how a developing country can transform itself - from the bottom up. Politically, it is democratic, pluralistic, inclusive. Its democracy is chaotic and imperfect, but it functions and it is moving forward. What counts is the vote, first and foremost. Accountability... that'll come later, at some point when democracy has produced enough social and economic equality. But that vote is empowering, it creates upward mobility and a huge constituency of the poor and underprivileged for democracy that gives it staying power. The executing machinery of this democracy is often faulty, but understands the constraints within which it operates. The election commission knows how to access and include people from the remotest corners of the country and overcome the boundaries of tradition - a case study that Afghanistan could use. The judiciary is overburdened and inefficient but also activist when necessary - Pakistan has seen that. The press is free and self-serving but enough times the watchdog it needs to be; the parliament is obstructionist but vital. Rather than spill blood, Indians have learned to use electoral politics and affirmative action to negotiate their way up and out of the centuries-old repressive caste system that left craters of inequality. It left India's elite, the Brahmins, excluded from the political and administrative system, so they turned to entrepreneurship from their professional degrees - mostly engineering. That's how information technology arrived in India, like the new avatar of Vishnu, bestowing upon India its transformative powers of a virtually workable existence. Sure, all developed countries have software, cellular and satellite technology. But resource-poor India used it differently. Software services were used as the engine of exports. Cellphones weren't just about communication but also about affordability. And affordable, home-built satellites which brought in western programming, transported ordinary Indians into the drawing rooms of the world and forever changed the aspirations of generations of young Indians. They all want to emulate the success of those Brahmin engineers, and education - which gives them freedom from poverty - has become their priority. Now India is known as a country whose brain power has 'ingenuity' and the unique capability of 'frugal engineering.' It also has model corporations like the Tata Group, which have a charitable trust as is majority shareholder, and understands the true meaning of 'stakeholders' and 'shareholders.' Companies like Fabindia have shown that artisanal collectives can compete with the mass production of China, and still keep India's delicate social balance intact. The economic success of a poor, democratic country is enough to threaten the terrorist way of life. But what really gives them sleepless nights is India's accessible dreams. It is possible in today's India, to go from rags to riches in one generation. There's confidence, there's education, there's increasing equality. This is fuelled by the exuberance of India's entertainment industry. Bollywood still produces mostly musical family fare but its stories have morals and are a handbook on how traditional, multi-religious and ethnic societies traverse the thorny path into the modern era without losing their identities. When terrorism strikes, Bollywood will show Muslims to always be the most loyal of friends. When traditionalists revolt against western cultural domination, Bollywood will tell the tale of a girl who lives in America and wears a short skirt, but can still fall in love with a son-of-the-soil and be a devoted wife in small town India. Television also unites this diverse India: talent from Kashmir to Meghalaya to Kerala dream of becoming the Indian Idol. The Taj and the Oberoi symbolized this India of accessible dreams. Accessible to Indians, but also to nations like India - poor, traditional societies, some re-emerging from the dark years of colonialism or misguided socialist policies or autocratic rule, looking for affordable, democratic, socially acceptable development models which will give them hope for a bright future. Exactly what the terrorists don't want.